wellhiddenmark.com

This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer.

I wholly reserve the right to change my mind, contradict myself, say stupid stuff and occasionally be a bit passive-aggressive. You know where the close button is, yeah?

Law firms and in-housers give deal bibles a bashing | News | The Lawyer

12 October 2009 | By Catrin Griffiths

A joint working party of in-house and private ­practice lawyers has thrashed out a common standardised approach for the exchange of electronic deal bibles. The new approach is intended to enable in-house departments to access important post-transaction documents.

The move was initiated by the Knowledge Management and IT In-house Group (KMIT), a group with 26 corporate members, including BAE Systems, BG Group and Coca-Cola Europe and which is led by Barclays legal department head of ­operations Andrew Dey.

The recommendations were created after detailed consultation with in-house lawyers across industry and is aimed at corporate and PFI deals.

Dey said: “In many in-house departments PCs are being locked down and you can’t read the CD bibles provided by the law firms for security reasons. The bible documents go to the IT department, which puts them on the network with numbered file names which [the in-house] lawyers can’t search properly.

“We had to come up with a standard, as I don’t think law firms understood the implications of what ­happened when the transaction bible actually went to the client.”

Members of the private practice Legal IT Innovators Group (LITIG), led by Wragge & Co partner Derek Southall, were involved in the initiative.

Southall said: “This is a three-pin plug for everything. It would be ludicrous if you bought a toaster and had 1,700 different plugs.

“The biggest thing the legal industry can do is pull together to find cross-­organisational efficiencies between law firm and client.”

 

Is social media REALLY worth the effort? | Legal Marketing: Social Media Edition

Alertbox: Distributing Content Through Social Networks and RSS

From: alertbox@nngroup.com (Jakob Nielsen)
Date: 12 October 2009 18:00:54 GMT+01:00
To: "Alertbox Announcement List" <alertbox@laser.sparklist.com>
Subject: Alertbox: Distributing Content Through Social Networks and RSS
Reply-To: bounce-alertbox-15057013@laser.sparklist.com

Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for October 12 is now online at:

http://www.useit.com/alertbox/streams-feeds.html

Summary:
Users like the simplicity of messages that pass into oblivion over time,
but were frequently frustrated by unscannable writing, overly frequent
postings, and their inability to locate companies on social networks.

SharePoint 2007 - Site Groups and Permission Levels Explained

SharePoint use cases - Document libraries: Specify which items users can edit/delete

Idealware: Why SharePoint Scares Me

http://www.idealware.org/blog/2009/07/why-sharepoint-scares-me.html

This is an excellent article which picks up on many of my current concerns having worked with a MOSS 2007 implementation for nearly two years. This is a Microsoft product, and of course IT departments of larger sized organisations will make the Microsoft choice precisely because of the integration benefits.

I'd say that to get the best out of a MOSS 2007 implementation, then all users should at least be us ing Office 2007 in tandem to make the best of the document management facilities and encourage collaborative working.